The U.S. government has officially designated several Mexican drug cartels and other Latin American gangs as foreign terrorist organizations (FTOs). This monumental decision, announced on February 19, 2025, represents a significant recalibration of U.S. policy toward combating transnational organized crime and drug trafficking that poses a direct threat to national security.
#1
The designation of an entity as a Foreign Terrorist Organization is far from a mere symbolic gesture. It's a strategic tool used by the U.S. government to combat groups that engage in activities that threaten national security. The label carries significant legal and political weight, and it's essential to understand what it means.
Generally, FTO designations have been reserved for groups engaging in violent extremism with clear political or ideological goals. Think of groups like ISIS or Al-Qaeda, organizations known for their global reach and intent to destabilize nations through acts of terror. However, with the rise of powerful drug cartels capable of challenging state authority and wreaking havoc through violence, the U.S. government has opted to expand the FTO classification to include these groups.
The Significance of the FTO Designation

Generally, FTO designations have been reserved for groups engaging in violent extremism with clear political or ideological goals. Think of groups like ISIS or Al-Qaeda, organizations known for their global reach and intent to destabilize nations through acts of terror. However, with the rise of powerful drug cartels capable of challenging state authority and wreaking havoc through violence, the U.S. government has opted to expand the FTO classification to include these groups.
#2
The classification of FTOs is dictated by Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which authorizes the Secretary of State to designate a foreign organization as an FTO if it meets specific criteria. These criteria are:
1. The entity must be a foreign organization.
2. The organization must engage in terrorist activity as defined in Section 212 (a)(3)(B) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). This includes actions like hijacking, hostage-taking,
assassination, and the use of weapons of mass destruction.
3. The terrorist activity must threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security of the
United States.
If these criteria are met, the U.S. government can officially designate the organization as an FTO, setting into motion a series of legal and financial consequences.
The Mechanics of the FTO Designation

1. The entity must be a foreign organization.
2. The organization must engage in terrorist activity as defined in Section 212 (a)(3)(B) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). This includes actions like hijacking, hostage-taking,
assassination, and the use of weapons of mass destruction.
3. The terrorist activity must threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security of the
United States.
If these criteria are met, the U.S. government can officially designate the organization as an FTO, setting into motion a series of legal and financial consequences.
#3
The following organizations have been officially classified as foreign terrorist organizations:
1. Sinaloa Cartel (Mexico): Arguably the most infamous of the cartels, the Sinaloa Cartel has been a
dominant player in drug trafficking for decades, known for its vast network and influence.
2. Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG) (Mexico): This cartel has rapidly expanded its presence
in recent years, rivaling the Sinaloa Cartel in power and employing extreme violence to
maintain control.
3. Gulf Cartel (Mexico): One of the oldest drug cartels in Mexico, the Gulf Cartel has been
involved in drug trafficking, extortion, and other criminal enterprises for decades.
4. La Nueva Familia Michoacana (Mexico): This cartel operates primarily in the state of Michoacan
and is known for its involvement in drug trafficking, extortion, and violence.
5. Carteles Unidos (Mexico): A coalition of smaller cartels formed to combat the dominance of
larger groups like the CJNG, Carteles Unidos operates in various parts of Mexico.
Cartels Under Scrutiny: The Designated List

1. Sinaloa Cartel (Mexico): Arguably the most infamous of the cartels, the Sinaloa Cartel has been a
dominant player in drug trafficking for decades, known for its vast network and influence.
2. Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG) (Mexico): This cartel has rapidly expanded its presence
in recent years, rivaling the Sinaloa Cartel in power and employing extreme violence to
maintain control.
3. Gulf Cartel (Mexico): One of the oldest drug cartels in Mexico, the Gulf Cartel has been
involved in drug trafficking, extortion, and other criminal enterprises for decades.
4. La Nueva Familia Michoacana (Mexico): This cartel operates primarily in the state of Michoacan
and is known for its involvement in drug trafficking, extortion, and violence.
5. Carteles Unidos (Mexico): A coalition of smaller cartels formed to combat the dominance of
larger groups like the CJNG, Carteles Unidos operates in various parts of Mexico.
#4
The designation of Mexican drug cartels as FTOs has elicited strong reactions from Mexico. President Claudia Sheinbaum expressed concerns that it could harm diplomatic relations between the two countries and potentially open the door for U.S. intervention in Mexico.
Sheinbaum also raised the possibility of legal action against U.S. gun manufacturers, arguing that they are responsible for supplying the weapons used by cartels in Mexico. The relationship between the U.S. and Mexico is incredibly complex, involving shared borders, trade agreements, and intertwined economies. This designation adds another layer of complexity, potentially straining relations between the two countries.
Reaction from Mexico

Sheinbaum also raised the possibility of legal action against U.S. gun manufacturers, arguing that they are responsible for supplying the weapons used by cartels in Mexico. The relationship between the U.S. and Mexico is incredibly complex, involving shared borders, trade agreements, and intertwined economies. This designation adds another layer of complexity, potentially straining relations between the two countries.
#5
The U.S. decision to classify these cartels as FTOs is not without controversy. Critics argue that it could lead to unintended consequences, such as the further fragmentation of cartels and an increase in violence. Others fear that it could be used as a pretext for military intervention in Mexico, which would be viewed as a violation of Mexican sovereignty.
The designation also raises questions about the broader strategy for combating drug trafficking. Some experts argue that focusing solely on law enforcement and military tactics is not enough and that a more comprehensive approach is needed, including addressing the root causes of drug trafficking, such as poverty and lack of opportunity.
A Controversial Move

The designation also raises questions about the broader strategy for combating drug trafficking. Some experts argue that focusing solely on law enforcement and military tactics is not enough and that a more comprehensive approach is needed, including addressing the root causes of drug trafficking, such as poverty and lack of opportunity.
#6
The designation of Mexican drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations marks a new chapter in the ongoing struggle to combat drug trafficking and organized crime. As this situation unfolds, it will be crucial to closely monitor the impacts on international relations, security, and the well-being of communities affected by cartel violence.
The decision is a complex one, laden with both potential benefits and risks, and its ultimate success will depend on the ability of the U.S. and Mexico to work together to address the challenges that lie ahead.
The Road Ahead

The decision is a complex one, laden with both potential benefits and risks, and its ultimate success will depend on the ability of the U.S. and Mexico to work together to address the challenges that lie ahead.
#7
terrorist organizations.
* This classification allows for financial sanctions and increased pressure on these groups.
* It raises significant diplomatic and legal questions regarding U.S.-Mexico relations.
* Critics warn of potential negative impacts on trade and international cooperation.
Key Takeaways
* The U.S. has designated major Mexican cartels and other Latin American gangs as foreignterrorist organizations.
* This classification allows for financial sanctions and increased pressure on these groups.
* It raises significant diplomatic and legal questions regarding U.S.-Mexico relations.
* Critics warn of potential negative impacts on trade and international cooperation.
#8
Q. What are foreign terrorist organizations?
A. Foreign terrorist organizations are designated by the U.S. government based on their
involvement in premeditated, politically motivated violence against non-combatants that
threatens U.S. national security.
Q. How could this designation affect businesses?
A. Businesses may face legal repercussions if they inadvertently engage with entities tied to
these cartels, potentially leading to a chilling effect on trade.
Q. What might happen next?
A. The designation could lead to increased discussions regarding intervention strategies against
these cartels, although no immediate military action is authorized by this classification. The
long-term impacts on international relations and anti-drug efforts are yet to be seen.
FAQ

A. Foreign terrorist organizations are designated by the U.S. government based on their
involvement in premeditated, politically motivated violence against non-combatants that
threatens U.S. national security.
Q. How could this designation affect businesses?
A. Businesses may face legal repercussions if they inadvertently engage with entities tied to
these cartels, potentially leading to a chilling effect on trade.
Q. What might happen next?
A. The designation could lead to increased discussions regarding intervention strategies against
these cartels, although no immediate military action is authorized by this classification. The
long-term impacts on international relations and anti-drug efforts are yet to be seen.